Request
Please, stop describing Christian “stuff”, like books, music, worship services, and whole churches, using the adjective “authentic.” The word has ceased to mean what it once did, and has been hijacked to mean something like the following:
au·then·tic, adj
- Sappy
- Overwrought
- Slightly but not overly heretical
- Having the pacing and tone of someone who sounds like he/she might have a second job as a college radio DJ (that is, while teaching)
- Involved in some ministry which the white, surburban church you grew up in neglected (so far as you know), such as helping out folks sick with AIDS, or (esp.) some “liberal” political cause
- Not having pews
- Having a pastor who preaches in a t-shirt and birkenstocks or overly tight pants that he/she bought at a vintage clothing store
- Incorporating incense and/or candles and/or any other liturgical accoutrements
- Indicating a preference to call one’s church a “faith community” instead of a church
- Having the proclivity to routintely and breathlessly use phrases like, “while we try to figure out what that looks like, together” or “faith journey”
Hmm… I would think to call something authentic should mean that it is genuine – in the case of Christian items, meaning it is Bible-based, straight from the Word, sound doctrine.. The watered-down approach to defining authenticity I think comes from places like the Oprah Camp or the Rick Gage Posse where authentic means, “straight from the heart,” when the Bible says our hearts are deceitful..
Warning Comment
But I have to ask what provoked this?
Warning Comment
RYN: I never even knew what Blue Like Jazz was, but I looked it up after your note (http://www.campuscrosswalk.org/2005-fall-16.html). I don’t think it’s anything I would call authentic, unless you were to be honest and say it was authentically a man’s writings about how he ‘feels about God’. It’s authentically that because that’s what it is. It’s not authentic alone – it’s not Truth.
Warning Comment