9/11 – In Plane Site (Part 5)

This part of the video investigates the possiblity that there might be something attached to the bottom of the plane that might have ignited just before it hit the tower. Some believe that this ‘bomb’ was used to make the impact of the plane hitting the tower look more dramatic as it would ignite the rocket fuel at the precise moment the tower is struck.

What I actually found more interesting than that was the testimony of the person who witnessed the plane going into the tower. The reporters on this broadcast asked if he saw any specific markings on the plane, as they were obviously trying to identify what airline was hijacked. Instead the witness said “There was a definite blue circle logo on the front of the plane, but that there were no windows on the side of the plane and that it DID NOT LOOK LIKE A COMMERCIAL PLANE”. There is no disputing what the person said, it was said during a live broadcast by someone who witnessed the event.

No windows on the side of the plane.

Not a commerical fight.

This person who is talking to the newcasters had no reason to lie and I wish this person would come forth to share this story again with news reporters and maybe even try to help identify the markings he supposedly saw on the side of the plane. This is a very damning piece of evidence. If it wasn’t a commercial plane that hit the tower, than what happened to the flight that was alledged to have hit the tower? Was that shot down too or was it taken somewhere else? Are the poeple who were on that flight still alive or were they taken out to keep a secret? The more you think about this the deeper this rabbit hole gets.

Call this whatever you want, but one thing it is not is boring…

Continued in next entry…

crazy_pilot

September 14, 2006

Two counterpoints: 1: The fuel is midway back in the fuselage, and in the wings. That tiny explosion wouldn’t have any effect on the fuel tanks. 2: There is a lot of explosive stuff in the nose of the plane. Oxygen tanks would be a likely culprit. Yes, something exploded. Anyone who wanted to ignite the plane’s fuel would never have placed a bomb there.

Also, whether or not there were windows on the side of the plane is difficult to judge. Maybe this person was absolutely sure there weren’t any, but that doesn’t mean he was correct. Windows are small, and at 800-1000 feet above ground, on a plane travelling several hundred miles per hour, the witness would likely have only a 1 or 2 second glimpse. Not enough for a credible account.

Crazy Pilot: Oxygen tanks are a good guess, never really considered that… especially since the pilots would likely have their own supply for the cockpit. As for the windows, if they all had the shades pulled down, it could have looked like there were no windows there at all. I mean if I hijacked a plane, I’d have everyone draw the shade so they wouldn’t know where we were going or what wewere doing until the last possible moment. But that doesn’t change the fact that the person didn’t think it was a commercial flight. There were no logos on the plane, no distinct markings like United Airlines or whatever on the plane. That’s why he didn’t think it was commercial, it didn’t look like one based on all the clear markings and advertising that is usually plastered on the sides of them all…

Perhaps that one lone person had bad eyesight. How many others said “it didn’t look like a commerical plane?” I saw both planes crash, they looked normal.