Sharia…
The following article made me think of something MJ said a while ago
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040529/COWENT29/TPNational/Canada
Around the time that she mentioned it, we were dealing with a teenage girl who was not meeting the expectations of her family who also happened to be Muslim. Her father tried to kill her because she had stayed away very late, and the suspicion of her family was that she had been ‘despoiled’.
In the PC environment that we live in, an arrangement was made for her to live with another Muslim family.
The family she went to live with appeared much stricter in terms of following the dictates of Sharia. This was based on the pressure of her family, who no longer enjoyed unsupervised contact with their child because there were attempted murder charges pending against them.
Her mother had been betrothed to her American husband from Lebanon, and she had been released to his family based on her own families misinformed idea that she was marrying into ‘wealth’. This girl reported that her mother was treated very badly by her inlaws, and any complaint she might have about her situation was greeted with beatings by her husband(or any of his family members that she might have offended with her ‘outspokeness’).
I wonder about this. We have had other Muslim women at our facility, grossly disturbed by schizophrenia, that required our appeals to the local Iman to mediate…..their husbands wanted them home to care for the house and children in spite of their absolute craziness. The Iman told their husbands that these women needed care. Their husbands backed down in the face of the Iman’s words.
I wonder about this in the context of this young girl.
She was not ‘crazy’….only infected by the freedoms that she saw around her in her American peers. She was brought to the hospital by the police because her family had tried to kill her.
There was an interesting appeal made by a women recently who was seeking political asylum in the US based on the fact that her culture condoned domestic abuse. Several changes were made in the immigration law in the US that provided for this discrimination based on gender . This is a change in the focus of the asylum system, which generally comes into play when there is a regieme change and people are persecuted on the basis of their political affiliation.
Example:
http://www.rreeves.com/pub_216.htm
I wonder how this application of the laws of Sharia will play out in Canada, the country so dedicated to upholding human integrity and multiculturalism.
I just hope it doesn’t come back to haunt them…..
Quite frankly I do not see good coming out of it. The only people who will really want to apply it will be the more orthodox Muslims with retrogressive ideas about women. Many Muslim women are horrified that having immigrated to Canada to find gender freedom, they will be thrown back into the kinds of situations they sought to escape.
Warning Comment
I think there comes a time when immigrants have to assimilate into their adopted country. Part of that melding includes living under the law of the land. While cultural differences should be respected and included whenever possible, there has to be conformity for the general good of society. When you adopt a country, you embrace the new culture, too.
Warning Comment
While there is nothing wrong with allowing the man to head the household, I think when Allah laid down his law, it was with an eye to protecting the family unit, not free reign for bullying. Ditto any other religion. I’ve seen men who claim to be Christian make their wives beg for money, too. The message of religion is creation and love. Mankind would do well to remember that.
Warning Comment
Domestic abuse is common in Canada even if it isn’t sanctioned. The path for the victims isn’t easy…there is no overarching organization that can help these women (and occasionally men) actively change their lives. Too they tolerate the abuse because they are trying to provide economic and social stability for their children.
Warning Comment