Reverse sexism.

I read someone’s diary today, and it’s content was a basic listing of comparisons between men and certain objects, and with each one the male is degraded. This was from a female’s diary. Yet if such a thing was posted let’s say in a office, by a woman, degrading men, it wouldn’t be looked down on. Yet If the situation was reversed and the man was on the sexist offensive there would be hell to pay. Sexual equality does not infer the right to degrade the other.

What bothers me about reverse sexism is that women complain about men, those around them, and yet in many cases the men around them aren’t at all sexist. The anger is projected on the nearest body which has an extra appendage. It makes me want to gag.

They are in fact angry over the indiscressions of past men who had treated them wrong. But hey, if you can’t hate the penis who did it, hate the penis which is around.

It’s taken some of us so long to hike away from the sexual stereotypes and yet because of the past and the scorn which women misfocus on us (innocent) men we are punished. Again.

Women complain about wanting equality, yet it seems that no equality can ever be held, especially when they concrete themselves as hypocrites.

Log in to write a note

lol I hate no peni (is that right?) But VERY good points that you put out there.

i think it’s sexist of you to say “reverse sexism” because you’re already assuming that it’s women that can be looked down on by men. sexism is sexism no matter who it’s against.

maybe we’ll stop being “hypocrites” when we get paid as much as you for the same job, aren’t expected to shave a huge portion of our body and are treated equally

I agree with relish. I am not condoning men bashers, but we have to do so much to live up to men’s standards, and I think that sucks.