The Stanson Book Review: Non-Fiction

Well, I’ve basically failed miserably as far as my summer reading goals are concerned, but I’ve decided to do the non-fiction portion of our first annual Stanson Book Review, anyway. These are all books I read this summer, and they’re loosely ordered by how much I’d recommend them. Loosely being a key word there. And now we’ll begin.

1) Warrior Lovers by Catherine Salmon and Donald Symons: A small, but madly interesting book that tries to explain the popularity of “slash fiction” by using a Darwinian approach. For those not familiar with “slash fiction” (which I wasn’t until I read the book), it is a rather popular take off the romance novel, only it involves 2 men, usually famous partners (Starsky and Hutch for example), falling in love. Traditionally all of this is complete with explicit sex scenes. Oh, and it’s written almost exclusively by and for women. I would go into further detail, but, well, that’s what the book’s for. Believe me, it’s very interesting stuff, and the book actually makes slash fiction seem completely normal. The first few chapters also work as a pretty good introduction to Darwinism if you’re unfamiliar with it, and it’s just a very solid book all around.

2) Unrequited Love by Gregory Dart: A rather interesting look into “stalking and being stalked,” I found it refreshing in that it’s a nonfiction book that is not an academic work filled with hundreds of sources (as the other books I list in this category are), but, instead, it’s essentially a collection of Dart’s personal experiences with stalking (he’s been on both ends of the spectrum). The book is most successful with the aforementioned personal recollections, and falters a bit when Dart starts to babble about love’s definition as defined by 18th century philosophers, but, still, it’s a refreshingly easy read for a nonfiction book, and Dart offers a somewhat sympathetic and sensitive look into stalking, and why we do it. Another recommendation to most anyone.

3) Learning & Complex Behavior by John Donahoe & David Palmer: A very informative book about, well, learning and complex behavior, that’s also very technical. This isn’t the sort of book that provides interesting tidbits for you to chat about at dinner, and, unless you’re seriously interested in the learning processes that humans (and other animals) undergo, it’s probably not going to be for you. A lot of this stuff was way over my head too, so, you might want to have a nice background in psychology before tackling it.

4) What to Say When You Talk to Yourself by Chad Helmstetter: I didn’t care much for this one, despite agreeing with a lot of the author’s ideas, simply because he isn’t much of a writer and he doesn’t do much to back up his viewpoints other than anecdotal evidence. There are better books on this subject.

<span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language:

EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA”>5) The Power of the Eyes by Patricia Webbink: A mildly informative, but spectacularly dull (not to mention dated) book. Webbink lacks any charisma, and this is a very dry read about eyes and how we use them in social situations. I really can’t imagine this interesting any of you, short of those doing a research paper on eye behavior or something.

Ok, I’ll post a similar bit on fiction books within a few weeks, and it’ll likely be noticeably longer, depending on how much I read between now and then. There’ll likely be a few entries in between, but, fear not, the book reviews will come. I’m sure you’re all dying to read it. Well, Heather, at least . . .

Log in to write a note
July 25, 2005

Really Matt, sometimes I wonder about the books you read. But as you said, I’ll be waiting in anticipation for your next list. Really you must not make me wait too long. I need to see what books NOT to read.

Hmm. No, not quite the goal you were planning.

🙂 The one about slash fiction sounds interesting. 🙂 I have a pile of books I want to read…but i keep getting distracted by trashy chick lit books that only lasts a couple of hours. 🙂

wow thanks! i’ve been looking for a simpler approach to the inside of the stalkers mind ~ i just got ‘the anatomy of motive’ by john douglas & mark olshaker ~ but i have a few other reading projects i promised myself i’d finish before i settle into it. ~page

Well, I must stay that you have some every interesting reading habits. Those books would but me to sleep all safe the one about learning and behavior because I want to be a teacher. I prefer the classics, and poetry myself. But to each his own. I do look forward it see your next reviews.

July 26, 2005

RYN: (Maybe for once I’ll use that right) You know I actually thought about the letters being all broken up being an additional effect. I suppose its one of those accidental things that the scholars would pick apart. I can hear it now, some bald man in his deep voice, “By leaving parts of the letters missing she was showing how its pieces of her heart littered about..” Such silly rubbish.

OH! Learning & Complex Behavior… And you need a nice background in Psychology to understand it… I am SO going to research, find, and read this book! You rock my socks!!

July 26, 2005

Warrior Lovers actually sounds interesting.