Politics – To Be a President

I don’t feel like scanning the headlines today, so I’ll leave that for Friday. Today, I’ll elaborate on what I think a president should be and what the office should entail.

Being the president shouldn’t be a desired job. It shouldn’t be a job that you aspire to for the glory or the cushy lifestyle. It should be a job that one takes because they know they can make the lot of the US better than it was before.

It should be hard and inglorious because glory draws gloryhounds. Becoming the president shouldn’t lift you above the average folk. It shouldn’t end up making your rich or increasing your wealth. There should be no monetary concern involved in it. Though a president should be provided for while in office, they shouldn’t leave there appreciably more wealthy simply because they were the president.

Presidents should set their own beliefs aside in favor of the common good. They aren’t kings or other such rulers who serve their own interests. They’re servants of the people. Thus should leave some aspects of how the people live and shape their society to them alone. Such is a careful balancing act between that which the president should work on and that which he or she should leave alone, for the people to decide state by state.

A president need not be eloquent. I listened to Obama chat up the VFW today and some of the well polished, flowery words he had to share made me smirk in disdain. The more colorful one’s words, the more likely they’re false words or platitudes. I prefer a president who speaks plainly to the American people.

Don’t hand me a load of rhetoric as if that will effect my thinking. I swim in rhetoric and BS every time I read the news or watch some official televised function. All it does is make me think less of those who spout such things.

There shouldn’t be grand, personal presidential libraries that resemble museums more than actual libraries. All presidential correspondence and other such historical minutia should be stored in a central ‘library’ of presidential history, not unlike the National Arcives(probably better they be in their own facility, who knows how much room the Archives have after all these years).

It should all be stored there, administered by people who answer to no political party or affiliation. A dull, simple record of the history of the office, where people can go to review the triumphs and follies of the past without the spit shine of insecure men and women looking to create some grand legacy.

The office of president should be a simple affair, drawing simple, talented people. As it stands, there is too much glamour, too much to call those who care more for their own mark in this world rather than the welfare of the people and the world. We need a change. But who will bring the right change?

If I find em, I’ll let you know.

Log in to write a note
August 22, 2007

On some level you described President Bush. I’ve never felt that Bush dreamed of one day being President or dreamed of glory as President. He spent years as the owner of the Texas Rangers and from all accounts was perfectly content running the baseball team. He’s always come off as someone who thought he could do a good job for the people, not someone who wanted the office for his own personal power trip. Whether or not he did a good job isn’t at issue of course. Being independently wealthy, he certainly didn’t seek the White House for his own checkbook. As for your thoughts on Presidential libraries, I tend to agree. I tire of these libraries that do little more than glorify the men who served as President. Here in Grand Rapids we have the Gerald Ford library, a man who wasn’t elected to the office and served two years has a library. How ridiculous.

August 22, 2007

“On some level you described President Bush.” In 2000, he may have thought he could take the country in a better direction but I don’t think he ever had any clue how to do this. Being president didn’t lift Bush above average folk. He was that way all his life. He comes from the closest thing, beside the Kennedys, America has to a royal family. Bush has always represented the 48-51 percent

August 22, 2007

who voted for him but he assiduously gave the finger to the rest of the country. A president need not be eloquent, but he (or she) does need to be coherent. At the end of the day, the person is supposed to be a leader and leaders convince others to follow them. He’s certainly failed the “Don’t hand me a load of rhetoric” test. I’d argue that the biggest hindrance to your vision of the

August 22, 2007

presidency is campaign finance. In order to raise the hundreds of millions needed just to win the office (or just to be competitive), you need to be flowery, you need to have nice rhetoric, you need to pander to people in order to convince them to give you lots of money. But corporations don’t give you lots of money with no expectations of a return on their “investment.”

August 22, 2007

All I can say (and I will repeat myself many times, Im sure) is that we had 2 choices… and comming from this state, I DONT want someone from this state in office. (Even Mitt has to prove himself.. Although he at least has amused me AND did his JOB, which is better then the last clown to run from here on both counts.)

August 22, 2007

I never said he fit DarkRen’s ideals perfectly, I said some of them fit.

August 23, 2007

Bush is too much personal ideals and BS rhetoric for my liking. He might fit some aspects, but not enough for me to consider him a good president.