What is Education for?

In which teaching students about the Holocaust when Muslim students are present is compared to teaching students about slavery when White students are present. (But wasn’t it the Germans…? Oh, well).

In which teaching students about the Holocaust when Muslim students are present is compared to teaching students about slavery when Black students are present. (Huh?)

In which the Holocaust and the Crusades are considered similar in being offensive to Muslim students.

Silly me, I thought education was about providing information, including the lessons of the past.

_____________________________________________

The United Kingdom’s government has made the decision, based on research, to eliminate history lessons involving the Holocaust and the Crusades. The research showed many of Britain’s teachers felt it was offensive to teach such history in an area where there is a high number of minority Muslims.

The United Kingdom has compared the level of offense to Muslims with the reactions many white students feel about slavery being taught in the United States. The United Kingdom feels teaching such controversial topics can leave students feeling alienated and offended. The government believes this is the way many of the white and black students of the United States feel when slavery is taught.

It has been reported that some of the United Kingdom’s teachers chose to drop all lessons about the Holocaust completely out of fear that the Muslim students might choose to express their ideas in an anti-Semitic fashion. One British school decided teaching the Crusades would cause conflict between the non-Muslims and the Muslims. The main reason for eliminating the Crusades was that it would contradict what the mosques are teaching the children.

The United Kingdom Department for Education and Skills released a report. In the report, the following statement was given as to why the decision was made, “Teachers and schools avoid emotive and controversial history for a variety of reasons, some of which are well-intentioned. Staff may wish to avoid causing offence or appearing insensitive to individuals or groups in their classes. In particular settings, teachers of history are unwilling to challenge highly contentious or charged versions of history in which pupils are steeped at home, in their community, or in a place of worship.”

As part of the report, the researches displayed an example of a history department in a secondary school in the northern region of the United Kingdom that had decided to teach the Holocaust. This school made it necessary for students to graduate without having to learn about this part of the Jewish history. According the research reports, teachers are fearful of the possibility of confronting “anti-Semitic sentiment and Holocaust denial among some Muslim students.” At another school, parents of those students who practice Christianity are outraged at how the Arab-Israeli conflict has been taught. The report sated, “In another department, the Holocaust was taught despite anti-Semitic sentiment among some pupils, but the same department deliberately avoided teaching the Crusades (for middle school students) because their balanced treatment of the topic would have directly challenged what was taught in some local mosques.”

The study also concluded that too many teachers were playing it safe. The report stated teachers should receive better training to learn how to handle teaching controversial topics. The report said other issues, charged by emotion, have been taught in a bland manner, falsely portraying the Afro-Caribbean people as the central victim and ignoring the black pupils. The report also found teachers were down-playing the role of white authorities in the abolition of the slave trade, thus leaving the white students feeling alienated.

This report was released around the time when Britain will mark the 200 year anniversary of the end of the transatlantic slave trade. It was 200 years when laws were passed in the United Kingdom making it illegal to participate in slavery. The anniversary sparked heated protests and high demands for the government to issue a formal apology for the country’s role in the slave trade.

Earlier in 2007, a government review of citizenship education believed all pupils should learn about controversial issues, such as slavery and the Holocaust. The British government believes children should be allowed to develop their own sense of identity within the British society. The government believes if children are allowed to create their own identity there would be less social divisions between the various groups.

Source:

Telegraph Media Group Limited

Log in to write a note
April 15, 2007

I was the rare white kids in school when we were taught about slavery. The few white kids in the schools always got it hard during those lessons. Still it had to have been taught. I think in classes like that they should do it in a way that doesn’t make one group of people look bad.

If it could be taught without prejudice by the teacher I would say it is okay to teach about slavery. But, to have a racist teaching about slavery wouldn’t be suitable to me in the public schools. It is a tough question to think about, isn’t it? I definitely think that slavery should be studied in history classes, however, and when taught properly, the children would be given the emotional support they would need to study the question and in many ways, it might help with prejudice between the Muslims, Christians, and the Jews. These are the three monotheistic religions on the planet; all worshiping the God of Abraham. So it is amazing to me that these three religions get along so poorly. They share so much, but Abraham alone should be enough of a unifying history for all of us to respect one another. Love,

April 16, 2007

The past is written and should be taught as written; and Political meddling should be fought! I dislike the way people take on history as personal responsibility, to apologize for events that took place generations before is so much empty rhetoric. To agree that what ever events were wrong is justified if that is your view. [Carried over.]

April 16, 2007

[Continued] The Crusades and the Holocaust are facts of world history, to deny or play dawn is wrong.

April 16, 2007

This decision must have been made by a Committee

April 16, 2007

Absolutely appalling.

April 17, 2007

jamez wasn’t in any of the history classes I was in … when s/he says “The past is written and should be taught as written…” s/he overlooks the obvious “written by whom?” even though we think we know the story of eg the Holocaust in much greater detail than that of hte various Crusades, and we may think there is only the story of “good vs evil” in the Holocaust story, the way it is taught is probably the real issue. I’d be getting together a committee (depite Thomas’ remark above) and finding people from eg the Muslim community, Muslim studies people from an academic background, Jewish people in similar categories, Christians, etc and then with the guidance of History Experts and Pedagogical Experts, this could be the chance to write a syllabus that moved human understanding forward — that is one potential in History studies that the government of the UK should not let slip- but I fear it will.