Cochlear Implants

I watched a documentary today about a family who struggled with the decision whether or not to let their child undergo surgery that would allow their deaf child to hear.  One brother was born deaf, as was his wife and their three children.  The other brother was born hearing; his hearing wife was born to deaf parents.  Both couples considered whether to not to go through with surgery on their deaf children.  The surgery involves a bit of technology called a cochlear implant.  It allows a completely deaf person the opportunity to hear.  When implanted in young children, the chance to gain speech skills very near those developed by hearing children dramatically increases. 

The deaf individuals reacted very strongly to the suggestion that their deafness was less than ideal.  They  were proud of deaf culture and of deaf communication, and they didn’t want their deaf children to lose that heritage.  The educators believe that a child with a coclear implant should not sign, as it can impede their ability to learn speech. 

The deaf parents at times seemed to want to do what was best for their child; at other times they made statements that made it seem like they needed to validate their own deafness.  I certainly couldn’t decide what I thought was best, so I don’t know how they could.  They were violently opposed to their brother/sister-in-law’s decision to have the surgery on their son.  They viewed it as wholesale rejection of deaf culture and (I believe) their achievements as deaf people in a predominantly hearing world. 

I couldn’t help but translate some of what I saw to fit my own experiences as a gay person.  Some of it simply can’t correlate; parents cannot know that their newborn infant will grow up to be gay.  However, I heard a lot of things that I’ve similarly heard in the gay community, particularly in relationship to genetic research and the possibility that identification of a "gay gene" could someday result in the births of no more gay people.  The cochlear implant represents the eradication of an entire culture, community, and communication system for a people that have been marginalized by the greater society.

And then the question follows: if there was a technology or drug that could change someone’s sexuality to heterosexual, would you use it?  It’s not hard to make the argument that deafness is not preferred in nature; it is just as easy to say that heterosexuality is the standard since procreation is the common goal of all living things.  And while no one questions that deaf people did not choose their deafness, they are questioned when they reject the opportunity to become hearing like the rest of us.  Why would they reject the opportunity to become "whole"?  When considering that question as a gay man, I find it not so hard to believe that a deaf person would pass on hearing.  I don’t consider myself disabled, so I can’t see myself having surgery or taking a drug to become heterosexual.

The hearing people in the documentary argue that deaf people do not experience an entire dimension of life that is sound, and so why is it fair to deny that to their children if it’s not necessary.  I would argue that there is likely a dimension of deafness that we hearing people will never experience which may be just as rewarding.  As impossible as it is for hearing people to relate the experience of sound to deaf people, so might that dimension be impossible to describe to the hearing.  I think it’s very easy to say that there is an experience of gayness that transcends the simple mechanics of sex, and that that experience is in so many ways a joyful source of inspiration and satisfaction that heterosexual people cannot achieve.  Likely there is a dimension to heterosexuality that must be similarly fulfilling, and I imagine that the powerful experience of bringing forth a new life with the person you love is a huge part of that. 

I don’t fault the hearing parents for having the surgery so that their deaf son will hear.  It’s what they know.  Parents of gay children often feel they must try to get their child to live the heterosexual lifestyle so that they will be treated as equals by the outside world.  The hearing brother said that the cochlear implants means the end of deaf culture.  There’s no implant for gayness yet, however, and I don’t know what will happen when there is.

Log in to write a note
September 11, 2006

Very interesting article. I worked with a kid with a cochlear implant, but his speaking still wasn’t very good, and he still did sign language as did all his family, who had full hearing. I’ve never thought about comparing deaf culture with gay culture. It is a very interesting comparison. I think if my parents had the choice, they might make my sister straight. i think they find it tough at times having a daughter who doesn’t match up with what they feel are their values. But i can’t imagine it any other way. Its not something I’d change in her if i had the chance.

September 11, 2006

I don’t think I would have thought of it this way, and I’m really interested by the comparison. I definitly would NOT want to change the fact that I was gay–I agree about the other dimension. I’m sure it must be incredibly difficult to make a life altering decision like that for a small child.

September 11, 2006

In my opinion deafness is a disability because it is a psysical impairment. Homosexuality is in no way a disability and it cant be chosen any more than a heterosexual can choose to be a heterosexual. I think it would be a very sad thing for there to be an implant for gay people to make them straight. Whats next? Make everyone like the same foods, music, colors, etc.?

September 11, 2006

But if it was my son that was deaf Id definately want him to get the cochlear implants. Hearing is such an incredible thing that alot of us take for granted. How could I let him go through life without ever even being able to hear my voice? The ocean? A dog bark? Birds in the morning? I think it would be very selfish not to give your child that opportunity just because you cant have it yourself.

September 12, 2006

Plus, keep in mind, people might take a pill to be gay. I don’t think too many people would take a pill to be deaf.

interesting analogy. your entry is fabulous. i take issue with some of these notes. one of your noters say they’d want their child to hear, but a deaf parent might want their child to see … deaf people literally do see more, better, etc, studies show that the brain ends up utilizing the area for hearing for seeing. ( not going to get out of bed to exactly quote book and cite source)<P> the idea that because the majority can hear means it is preferable is laughable, because then one would have to extend such reasoning across some board, don’t you think? everything that some majority can do, will do, wants to do must be right and preferable? i don’t think so. cochlear implants at this time also don’t allow hearing as non hearing impaired know it, so then “they” still can’t hear the same… so i wonder what exactly your noter thinks s/he knows her/his child would be missing. “Whats next? Make everyone like the same foods, music, colors, etc.?” well apparently if everyone has to hear to be living a full and complete life.