A question for everyone
How much freedom would you be willing to give up?
Let’s do a thought experiment for a moment. Let’s pretend that the following scenario is possible:
There exists a system by which the perfect world leader can be found. This system is self-sustaining, and will always succeed in finding the right person to lead the entire world. The person selected would be wise, moral, kind and so forth, but would also be firm, fair and responsible. Under this person, the world will experience no more poverty, no more hunger, no more strife.
Wars would be eliminated. People would never again starve to death. Children would never again suffer from malnutrition, lack of education and neglect.
Everyone would be living in relative prosperity. Everyone will be able to have at least the basic necessities of life.
All religions would be respected, no racism would be tolerated, no hatred of fellow person allowed. In short, we would all get to lead the generally free lives we would all want to lead, with the exception of one thing: we do NOT get a choice regarding who leads the world. The system will choose for us.
This leader, for want of a better term, will be known as the "Benevolent Dictator," for it is he/she who would take charge of every government on earth.
The Decision: Would you accept this scenario, if offered? Would you allow one benevolent dictator to run the world, on the understanding that all these other things come true?
* * * * *
My thoughts?
Well, I can break them down into two parts:
1) I think that this scenario is better than what we have now. I don’t trust most of the world to properly select the leaders that run our nations. This scenario will lead to the end of global poverty, hunger and strife. This scenario would mean there would be BILLIONS more happy people on earth. And at what expense? The right to choose your elected leader? I would say "do it" in a heartbeat. No hesitation;
2) Do we really trust our leaders anyway? I mean, truly? How many of us are sick and tired of the ineptitude and corruption that seems to permeate the vast majority of the political leadership of the world? I mean, are we REALLY giving up that much? It seems to me that not many of these so-called "leaders" would ever be missed.
And before you all pepper me with ideas like, "but freedom should always be protected…." let me say that I think freedom’s good, assuming the choices we make are both capable of improving our lives, and are representative of the very best possible people we can find. I don’t put much stock in freedom if you only get, for instance, two choices, neither of which really inspires you.
I’m not advocating a return to a monarchical system; far from it. I am saying that, sometimes, freedom can be overrated, and where billions of lives are at stake, freedom can especially be dangerous. After all, how many dictators and/or idiots have we "elected" under the guise of democracy anyway? And how much damage have they done to our nations, and to the world?
Of course, all of this is contingent on actually FINDING that perfect leader. But assuming we do… what would YOU do?
assuming we do find the perfect leader, i think it’s ok if he/she leads the entire world. coz when we have settled our basic necessities like hunger and poverty, then we are in the state to enjoy mental luxuries like freedom.
Warning Comment
Of course I’d choose the new system, looking at the overwhelming benefit. When choosing leaders we feebly attempt to choose someone capable of providing those benefits you listed anyway. The important freedoms involve having the ability to explore who you are, free from violence or oppression. The freedom to choose a leader in this case would seem overrated. =/
Warning Comment
I think that if one true leader COULD be found he/she would have a lot of difficulty trying to coordinate all the activities of the world; they can’t be everywhere at once. I’ve a hunch that a lot of people wouldn’t take that leader seriously if they were responsible for such a large area as the world.
Warning Comment
I’m with you 100%. The only problem would be.. what if the system gets a glitch? Then we’re screwed. lol
Warning Comment
My recent course of study is making me address that very question from my own perspective… Idealists, intellects, revolutionaries and philosophers throughout our past have provided very convincing favourable arguments -however in practice they have been inevitably bastardised by their practioners (although many regimes have enjoyed glimpses of the possible Utopia -or near as damn it)…
Warning Comment
Personally, I think that in the idealistic world you describe there would not be much reason for personal growth. It is, after all our situations that push us to reach for solutions. Then there are so many paths to choose by which to attain solutions. Those paths, which ever we choose, form us. Right or wrong we learn and we choose to grow or not. With everything taken care of for us we would be more likely, I think, to get lazy in every aspect of life. Don’t get me wrong, being taken care of would be lovely. I would have the freedom and time to create, I would have the time to go after more pedophiles, Yes, I think in your perfect world people would still do imperfect things. I would have the time with my daughter that I covet more than almost anything else. I want everyone to be happy and okay but never in a million lifetimes would I entrust one person with that job. It is my job to find my happiness and to teach my little one to find her happiness in what ever situation we find ourselves in. Maybe I have taken this a bit to serously. I have just been smothered in kisses and been reminded to laugh and reminded that it is time to go to the park. Bring on the world r
Warning Comment
ruler. I guess if I believe what I just said it won’t matter who is in charge of the world. I still won’t trust him/her though. 🙂
Warning Comment