News article that caught my eye…

The only reason I am putting this in here, is because I believe that someone who attacks a pregnant woman and hurts either the mother or the baby is commiting a serious offense against both. For some reason I always thought that a baby, even unborn, was considered a human being and that entitled them to be fought for. So shouldn’t someone who hurts one in a violent act be punished? If this is just now a law, then what happened before? Was the fact that a baby hurt or murdered overlooked?

I will not debate abortion with anyone. That is not what caught my interest in this article. I am happy that all people have beliefs as to whether or not it is right or wrong, I have my own, but I will not talk about them. My husband is a preacher’s son, and I will not discuss this issue with him. Please do not take offense. I simply have no interest in a political or a moral debate. Thank you.

Mandy

p.s. This is from Yahoo! If you wanted to know.

WASHINGTON – The Senate voted Thursday to make it a separate crime to harm a fetus during commission of a violent federal crime, a victory for those seeking to expand the legal rights of the unborn

The 61-38 vote on the Unborn Victims of Violence Act sends the legislation, after a five-year battle in Congress, to President Bush for his signature. The White House said in a statement that it “strongly supports protection for unborn children.” The House passed the bill last month.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said the bill was “powerful because this act is about simple humanity, about simple reality.”

But abortion rights lawmakers contended that giving a fetus, from the point of conception, the same legal rights as its mother sets a precedent that could be used in future legal challenges to abortion rights.

It was the second big win for social conservatives, who last year pushed through protections for the unborn with enactment of the so-called partial birth abortion ban. That ban is now tied up in the courts.

The Senate cleared the way for passage with a 50-49 vote to defeat an amendment, backed by opponents of the bill, that would have increased penalties for harm to a pregnant woman but did not attempt to define when human life begins.

Sen. John Kerry D-Mass., President Bush’s opponent this fall, interrupted his campaign schedule to vote yes on the amendment. He voted no on final passage.

The bill states that an assailant who attacks a pregnant woman while committing a violent federal crime can be prosecuted for separate offenses against both the woman and her unborn child.

The legislation defines an “unborn child” as a child in utero, which it says “means a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb.”

“This bill recognizes that there are two victims,” said Sen. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio, a chief sponsor. Americans, he said, “intuitively know that there is a victim besides the mother.”

The key obstacle was an amendment by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., that would have imposed the same tougher penalties for attacks on pregnant women as outlined in the DeWine bill but made no attempt to define the beginning of life.

Feinstein said that by defining when life begins, the bill was “the first step in removing a woman’s right to choice, particularly in the early months of a pregnancy before viability.” She said it could also chill embryonic stem cell research.

The Senate also defeated an amendment by Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., that would require employers to give unpaid leave, and states to pay unemployment benefits, to women when they or family members are victims of domestic or sexual violence.

Supporters of the bill have named it after Laci Peterson and her unborn child, Conner, victims in the highly publicized murder case in California. California, one of 29 states with an unborn victims law, is trying Peterson’s husband, Scott, on double murder charges.

Laci Peterson’s stepfather, Ron Grantski, said at a Capitol Hill news conference that he and Laci’s mother had received several hundred thousand sympathy cards and “they all mourned our loss of Laci and Conner — not Laci and the fetus.”

The Senate bill covers 68 federal crimes of violence, such as drug-related shootings, violence at an international airport, terrorist attacks, crimes on a military base and threats against a witness in a federal proceeding.

It would specifically exclude prosecution of legally performed abortions — a fact supporters cite in arguing that the bill would not undermine the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision affirming a woman’s right to end a pregnancy.

“The criminals who commit these crimes are not committing abortions,” said Douglas Johnson, legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee. “They are depriving these unborn children of the right to life. It’s a separate issue related to the right to life.”