Is D.C. just another *Iraq * for them

Well if the abbreviation S.O. B. fits anyone it surely does fit the congressional bi-cameral response/interpretation of the current voting rights status for the citizens of  washington dc..

I wouldn’t write anything on this matter except for the fact that there  is a standing law/requirement that folks who are working for the dc government  must  be residents of the district of columbia… (which is a whole other hoggish way of using discrimination criminally…) under the watchful eye of the “Most High”  of whom..(the “impeccable”?) supreme court…

In its attempt to be perfect little “constitutionalist” the current debators who are not in favor of dc representation in their perfect little “ol boy’s/girl’s club”,  who can not wonder if these folks are as sincere about voting rights  as the reason that is used for bringing voting rights to other countries…

So now does the constitution really says we the people have the right to “F” anyone’s right to vote base on political status…or location if that is not a considered component of its political status…

Somewhere I hear a voice saying ” we the foreigners to voting rights” do declare….no voting rights for citizens of the U.S. who have been consigned to a region that has been declared to be unfit by reason of political design…(btw..their design,  which means it purposely set up a system of districts for maintaining a cloistered slave/feudal system)…

There is so much I would like to delve into with this matter… but I believe that the pen is a mighty sword only up to a point…then there must be something more to make it clear…to the ol boys/girls club…that talk is not going to be cheap for them if they continue down the path of vote annilihation for some….