Psychological Discrimination? Twinkle,Twinkle

Of  Unusual interest is that: the more I delve into etymology,
the more I find that supposingly comprehensive works do not contain the words
that are needed to critique or study the system of languages.

None of the home reference books that I have, mentioned this word
and only one online reference source does…
That word being ” synastry”. and the online dictionary that mentions it is:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/synastry

In a world of supposingly free press, editing out some words,
especially those words which are beneficial in understanding and
bridging the differences in the ignorance of the Scientific Origin of the Languages
and its relationship amongst itself, is a psychological discrimination.
Is it intentional?
It would be hard for me to think that this type of discrimination is anything other than that.

Gives a weight to the old phrase:

“Beyond the Stars”…..

for indeed to cradle the Birth of Our System of Languages we truly must look beyond the commercial reference logs and into the comprehensive works by conscientious contributors, to maintain that much deserved Knowledge…..

Here I must however give much attention to the fact that after its recent upgrading that the Wikipedia.org. website did include in its pages the word “eisegesis” which was previously found only in the “Oxford” Unabridged Dictionary…

Also it seems that this source also has the word “eisegesis” in it:
which is also a very valuable word yet is not given it dued respect , i.e.
not listed in most current popular reference sources:

http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/eisegesis

Twinkle Twinkle Little Star
How I wondered who you Are!