Info about a book that Palin tried to ban…

This is an interesting article, because it sheds a little light on the book that Palin tried to ban when she was mayor of Wasilla, Alaska only a short time ago. It’s one thing to try to ban a book (which cleary smacks in the face of the 1st Ammendment) but the book in question she wanted to toss out might suggest more about the canidate in question than one might think.

After the Librarian refused to ban any books at all, Palin tried to have her fired. There’s that ‘do as I say or your fired’ attitude at work again with Palin. With so many people saying Palin tried to fire them after they refused to do as she said, how can we not beleive that dude who was fired involved in that Troopergate thing? She’s got an awful mean streak if just one refusal is grounds to fire someone in her books. Talk about a God complex… how dare you say no to me! You’re fired!

Getting back to the topic at hand… according to the librarian of her town said the book titled “Daddy’s Roomate” by Michael Willhoite was the literature she zealously attempted to ban from the town library. The reason for her wanting to toss this book from circulation? The book in question tries to introduce and educate children about homosexuality. So if this is the book Palin was determined to ban from her town library, does this mean Sarah Palin is a homophobe?

Peter

Author Of Book Palin Targeted Lashes Back: She’s My Mortal Enemy

Written by Sam Stein

The author of the book Sarah Palin reportedly tried to have removed from her hometown library blasted back Saturday evening, saying the Alaska Governor had a “small-town mind,” was an enemy of intellectual freedom and a “disastrous choice” for vice president.

“I rather suspected one of my books might be the one she targeted,” said Michael Willhoite, author of “Daddy’s Roomate” and several other children’s books. “I can tell you right now, Ms. Palin is a very good mother and everything. But she is my mortal enemy. She is one of the enemies of the First Amendment and I can hardly [organize] my thoughts here, I am so offended by this.”

Reached by phone, Willhoite was ultimately not surprised he had once been Palin’s target. In fact, he admitted to being “strangely flattered” that he was “on her list.”

“I wasn’t on Nixon’s enemies list,” he said, “I was too young for that.”

After all, Willhiote has been at the center of religious conservative complaint ever since his work – which is about a young boy discussing his divorced father’s new, gay roommate – was first published in 1989. The book was the no. 2 “most frequently challenged book” between 1990 and 2000, according to the American Library Association. But that didn’t make him any less critical of Palin, who he saw as a dangerous politician, both on issues of press and literary freedoms as well as gay rights.

“I don’t think Ms. Palin will care for me, but that is fine,” said Willhoite, who is openly gay. “I don’t really care for her, not at all. I think John McCain made a disastrous choice. Unfortunately she seems to be doing well in the polls but I would think the honeymoon period will be ending soon.”

On Sunday, the New York Times fleshed out rumors that as mayor of Wasilla, Palin had asked the town’s librarian to remove certain books from the library’s shelves. Citing contemporary news accounts and witnesses – including Palin’s predecessor, John Stein, and her former campaign manager, Laura Chase – the paper reported that:

In 1995, Ms. Palin, then a city councilwoman, told colleagues that she had noticed the book “Daddy’s Roommate” on the shelves and that it did not belong there, according to Ms. Chase and Mr. Stein. Ms. Chase read the book, which helps children understand homosexuality, and said it was inoffensive; she suggested that Ms. Palin read it.

“Sarah said she didn’t need to read that stuff,” Ms. Chase said. “It was disturbing that someone would be willing to remove a book from the library and she didn’t even read it.”

“I’m still proud of Sarah,” she added, “but she scares the bejeebers out of me.”

Palin, in an interview before the Times’ article, dismissed the charge that she had fired the town’s librarian for banning books as an “old wives’ tale.” The McCain campaign, too, has called the entire matter a smear attack on the vice presidential candidate.

“This is categorically false. The fact is that as Mayor, Palin never asked anyone to ban a book and not one book was ever banned, period,” McCain campaign spokesman Brian Rogers said.

Asked how he feels about his book being thrust back into the political fire 19 years after it first caused waves of outrage, Willhoite fancied himself quite fortunate.

“The fact is my book did very well in the first years of publication,” he said, “and the lot of the reason it did as well as it did is because of the challenges from the right.”

But Willhoite expressed a sense of shock that a vice presidential candidate could harbor such positions, even if he predicted that issues of books and censorship would no longer be on Palin’s radar.

“To tell the truth I don’t think it is something she will attend to,” he said. “There will likely other more damaging things she will attend to. As a mayor of a small town she was attending a small town issue for small town minds. She has a small town mind, you see.”

Reprinted from The Huffington Post

Log in to write a note
September 15, 2008

I could see banning it if it was advocating white supremacy or something, but this is ridiculous. Anyone who wants to teach their child to hate gay people can do so without that book impeding their efforts – unfortunately. All they have to do is *not buy it*. I hate it when people try to force their way of thinking on others.

September 15, 2008

The most telling part was that she wouldn’t even read it….”didn’t need to read that stuff”.. She reminds me of some of those women that come into the pharmacy..that self righteous, preachy, everything is offensive to my darling spawn kind of mentality. I loathe it 🙂

September 15, 2008

It’s funny how the extreme right are the first to yell for their freedom of speech, usually to excempt their noxious rhetoric from question. Hitler burnt books. The Taliban burnt books. Stalin burnt books. The Mongols burnt books. Religious factions within Christianity, Judaism and Islam burnt books by other sects. The Spanish Inquisition burnt books. Dictators the world over from Pinochetto the Ayatollah burn books. When people talk of being “proud” of Sarah Palin I hope they remember her predecessors.

someone forwarded me an email written by ann kilkeny (sp?) where she outlines a lot of the intimidation palin ruled with, threatening jobs. this is an interesting site: http://womenagainstsarahpalin.blogspot.com/

September 15, 2008

It’s a long way from “it did not belong there” which is clearly a personal opinion to ‘banning’. The Left is getting desperate in their smears. Can you see the train wreck coming? It is.

September 15, 2008

gertrude- Hitler and Stalin were godless Leftists. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

September 15, 2008

SK: Sorry, I’m going to call your bull on that one: “Hitler was a Roman Catholic, baptized into that religio-political institution as an infant in Austria. He became a communicant and an altar boy in his youth and was confirmed as a “soldier of Christ” in that church. Its worst doctrines never left him… Sources: http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/murphy_19_2.html http://www.nobeliefs.com/Hitler1.htm http://www.evilbible.com/hitler_was_christian.htm As for Stalin, he too was deeply religious. His opposition of the Church steemed from the fact that he was fully aware and feared the power the Church was capable of welding. That can be considered a sign of respect, not atheism. So in actual fact, Hitler and Stalin were God fearing Righties… just like Palin and McCain. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it!

September 15, 2008

Hey, hey, hey everyone… that’s IHEARTSARAHPALIN!!1@! or <3<3SARAHPALIN<3<3.

September 15, 2008

I can’t even be bothered to formulate a reply to someone who accuses Hitler of being a lefty.

September 15, 2008

Though I will say interesting that I give a list of examples from across more than 2000 years of human history and from all sides of the political spectrum and the best retort is Hitler is a liberal.

September 15, 2008

didn’t you know that once you read about homosexuality, you become homosexual? i thought that was a widely known fact! all books “teaching” homosexuality should be banned! /sarcasm

uck. I don’t believe that any book should ever be banned, even if it advocates unpopular, politically incorrect ideas. It’s not the government’s place to restrict access to information or to attempt to regulate what people can see and read. Whether politicians think so not, censorship (of any kind, regardless of one’s intentions) IS a form of mind-control. Any attempt on the government’s part to engineer the thoughts of the masses has always, inevitably, led us to bad places. All politicians should be forced to study Modern History, the Soviet Union, and they should all be forced to read and discuss “Animal Farm” and “1984” If our politicians had a better understanding of the course of human events, I doubt any of them would support censorship in any form.

September 21, 2008

It is slick, isn’t it, how they are careful to say that, “as mayor” she never tried to have a book banned? The story clearly says that she did it as a councilwoman; saying she never did it as mayor deflects the issue neatly. And the fact that a book was never banned does not detract from the fact she tried to have it removed. People believe stuff because they don’t exercise their critical thinking skills. They stopped looking deeper than the sound byte.