Barry Bonds: Anatomy of a Cheater II

It’s that time of the year again. Players have reported to their camps in Florida and are starting to train for the season. We’re a little over a month away from opening day, and still the biggest story of the year is again the shame of all baseball: Barry Bonds. Also known to many baseball fans as the biggest cheater in the history of the game. Never in the history of the game has there been more need for an asterisk (*) to be added to the record books as there is here. How Selig can let this man continue to play despite the evidience present is a outrage and an insult to the game. I wish the prosecutors in California would get off their hands and just indict him for perjury and tax evasion already. I think they already have a good case and don’t need to wait for Anderson to come forward. Get this bum out of the game already. The minute he’s indicted for anything, San Fran will exercise a clause in the contract and terminate him immediately, and I have no doubt Selig will use it to ban him for life.

Like I said in this entry’s predesessor, I’m not talking about a short Steve Howe, five chances to come back kind of ban. I’m talking about a full blown lifetime ‘never come back, don’t let the door hit you on the way out’ ban. Do not pass go, do not pass Hank Aaron… go directly to baseball banishment and take a seat next to Pete Rose. No celebrations, no more games, no rings, no records, no hall of fame… nothing! Unless Selig goes this far, the example will be a bad one for the kids and that’s not what I nor what many other baseball fans want to see. The only way for baseball to save face is to take away the one thing that Bonds wants away from him, his record. Bonds is a disgrace to the game, and should be treated as nothing more. He shouldn’t be allowed to get near the Hank’s record. He’s not good enough to share in his company, and to let him chase his HR record is to condone cheating. A lifetime ban for the biggest cheater since the Black Sox is the only way to go, and Selig knows it. Whether or not he has the stones to do it is another matter all together.

You can also read the article posted today about the latest on the scandal and try to explain to me why this bum shouldn’t be kicked out of the game. But if baseball never gets the chance to show Barry the door, a friend of mine made a rather interesting point. Even if Barry does manage to pass Hank Aaron, he’ll only be holding the record for the real deal that is screaming up the homerun list: A-Rod. By the time that guy is finished his career, he’ll have well over a thousand homeruns. In other words, whatever record Barry takes will be short lived. I’d rather not wait for that to happen, but it’s a small consolation. I’d rather see him get the lifetime ban, but that’s just me. That ignorant, pompus ass deserves nothing less.

Peter

Supersized Barry

Shadows afterword details Bonds’ freakish growth

Written by Tom Verducci

One year after Game of Shadows, one of the most important books of our time, the possible indictment of Barry Bonds remains unresolved, his trainer, Greg Anderson, remains loyal enough to his client to stew in prison rather than testify against him, and baseball remains hostage to the ill will Bonds generates as the face of baseball Bud Selig can’t stand. The stench of stagnation is everywhere.

When will it end? Lance Williams, who authored Shadows along with Mark Fainaru-Wada, thinks the answer of whether or not Bonds will be indicted for perjury could come in the next six months.

“My gut feeling is we’re going to know before the end of the season,” Williams told SI.com. “I think they’ll come to some resolution [on whether to indict] and we’ll hear about it.”

But as the book is released this week in a paperback edition with a new afterword, the most important constant in the 12-month wake of Shadows is this: Bonds has not challenged a single fact in the book. It stands as an encyclopedia of this doping era in general and of Bonds’ massive doping regimen in specifics.

Bonds’ attorney, Michael Rains, has thrown his share of smoke bombs to divert attention from the facts: challenging the authors’ right to profit from the book (he summarily dropped the challenge, with virtually no hope of success), and now trying to demand disclosure by the feds of how much money they’ve spent on investigating Bonds and, ironically enough, asking them to continue spending more money in the case by continuing to pursue the identify of people who might have leaked information, though the chief leaker already has been outed.

You hear all that noise from the Bonds camp and yet most conspicuous is the silence on challenging the facts of the case. Shadows succeeded because it couched nothing and stood unchallenged. My favorite fact: the authors detail in their afterword the freakish growth of Bonds’ body parts in his years with the Giants: from size 42 to a size 52 jersey; from size 10 1/2 to size 13 cleats; and from a size 7 1/8 to size 7 1/4 cap, even though he had taken to shaving his head.

“The changes in his foot and head size,” they write, “were of special interest: medical experts said overuse of human growth hormone could cause an adult’s extremities to begin growing, aping the symptoms of the glandular disorder acromegaly.”

You cannot read the book without concluding that Bonds is one of the biggest serial dopers in sports history. So why haven’t the feds dropped the hammer on his little story about how he thought he was using flaxseed oil?

Williams said he believes the prosecution team “intended to indict last season” but its boss, Kevin V. Ryan, the United States attorney for the Northern District of California, wanted Anderson’s testimony against Bonds for an airtight case. But as Williams said, “Anderson has shown no intention to ever participate.”

Why would Anderson continue to simmer in an East Bay, Calif., prison? In addition to protecting “his biggest and best client,” Williams said, Anderson may feel double-crossed by the feds. Williams said the feds cut a plea deal with Anderson that included his cooperation in the form of testimony. Anderson objected to cooperating, and when he did so, the feds pulled the entire plea deal out from under him.

Anderson could remain in prison until January 2008 — “when the grand jury’s term expires in July and, if they wanted to be mean, they could extend [the sentence] another six months,” Williams said.

Meanwhile, Williams and Fainaru-Wada may have dodged prison themselves. The reporters from the San Francisco Chronicle faced the possibility of incarceration if they did not comply with a subpoena to reveal the identity of the person or persons who provided to them leaked grand jury testimony from the BALCO case, including Bonds’ flaxseed bit.

But since then, Troy L. Ellerman, a former defense lawyer for BALCO founder Victor Conte and BALCO VP James Valente, admitted he leaked the testimony to the reporters. He agreed to plead guilty to obstruction of justice and related charges. The subpoena compelling the reporters to testify was withdrawn last week. (The authors have not acknowledged any of their confidential sources.)

Ellerman is looking at a two-year sentence as part of a plea offer, but if the judge rejects that offer — there is a sentencing hearing in June — the judge could order the case to go to trial. In that scenario, Williams and Fainaru-Wada would most likely be called to testify, and they would be staring at the possibility of prison again if, as they intend, they do not testify regarding the identity of their sources.

“We’re still in some jeopardy,” Williams said.

Meanwhile, the decision on whether to indict Bonds no longer belongs to Ryan, who left his position Feb. 16, but to his replacement, Scott N. Schools, a former general counsel at the Justice Department.

“We can’t tell what he’s going to do,” Williams said. “The prosecution team thought they’d had enough [to indict] before. Now the question is does he agree with that?”

Until Schools decides to indict or not, the case moves nowhere, Rains’ histrionics notwithstanding. Anderson remains in lockup and Bonds remains a drag on the game. Meanwhile, the voices of Williams and Fainaru-Wada remain as free and clear as when we heard them last year.

Reprinted from CNN.com

Log in to write a note
February 28, 2007

The problem is that the substances Bonds may have used weren’t banned by MLB when he was alleged to have used them. Selig will not ban Bonds for life, in fact he probably won’t even suspend him. Like it or not Selig has no basis on which to ban Bonds, the fact that he’s a jerk or that he may have used steroids before MLB banned and tested for them isn’t justification to ban someone. The Giants will probably get rid of him though per their contract with him. For the record, I’m no fan of Bonds.

February 28, 2007

NL: Even though testing was light and almost non-existant, then commmish Fay Vincent banned the use of Steriods in MLB way back in 1991… long before Barry started using them. So if there is evidence that Bonds used them (test or no test) Bud could ban him if he so chooses to… if he had the minerals to do it. Later,

February 28, 2007

I don’t do sports, but hi!

February 28, 2007

you think a-rod can do it? I dunno. It’s really possible. I always thought Griffey, Jr would have done it. The guy is made of glass though.

February 28, 2007

Brian: Right now, A-Rod has 464 HRs.. and he’s only 31. If he keeps up this pace, he’ll bash 1000 before he turns 41… you heard it here first.

March 1, 2007

What exactly did Vincent ban back in 1991 and can it be proven that those substances were used by Bonds? There are performance enhancing drugs that were used by MLB players that were not on the ban list, I’m thinking of stuff like Andro. If I had to guess, the drugs Vincent banned in 1991 were not the drugs used by Bonds in part because designer drugs were created and became popular in the 90’s. I’ll go out on a limb and say Bonds didn’t break any rules that were in place in the late 90’s and early 00’s. Does that mean he was ethical? No. But if he didn’t use those specifically banned drugs than he broke no rules and Selig has no business banning him.

March 1, 2007

NL: MLBÂ’s Drug Policy in 1991 under Comissioner Fay Vincent: Commissioner Fay VincentÂ’s memorandum included the following provisions: The possession, sale or use of any illegal drug or controlled substance by Major League players and personnel is strictly prohibited. Those involved in the possession, sale or use of any illegal drug or controlled substance are subject to disciplineby the commissioner and risk permanent expulsion from the game. In addition to any discipline this office may impose, a club also may take action under applicable provisions of and special covenants to the uniform PlayerÂ’s Contract. This prohibition applies to all illegal drugs and controlled substances, including steroids or prescription drugs for which the individual in possession of the drug does not have a prescription. Steroids have always been a controlled substance. This means if caught, MLB has more than enough grounds to show him the door since these were added to the rules in 1991.

March 1, 2007

RYN: Not all steroids are controlled substances in America. For example, Andro is considered a steroid but it isn’t illegal. Futhermore, part of the problem here is that doctors may have been involved in this thing, in which case players were recieving these drugs legally. From what you have quoted, Vincent’s drug ban wasn’t aimed at performance enhancing drugs it was aimed at illegal street drugs. What you quoted doesn’t mention performance enhancing drugs at all, that’s a big omission.