9/11 – In Plane Site (Part 3)

This portion of the video looks at the lack of structural damage taken by the pentagon, which is inconsistent with a building that had been slammed into by a massive 757. Until the collapse of roof well after the damge was made, there was no actual structural damage to the room which was intact for a while before collapsing. As the previous portions of the video explained there was also a real lacking of fire damage which is inconsistent it this building was hit by a plane that was holding a enough rocket fuel to travel to the west coast. I’m not claiming to have any of the answers, but what a lot of this does is just raise a lot of questions. Where’s the blaze that should have gone on for days. Where are the parts of the plane? Where is the crater in the ground that Flight 93 created when it slammed into the ground?

The more you look at the Pengaton, the less likely it looks like a plane hit it all all. So the real questions floating around should be are the following:

1) If a plane didn’t hit the Pentagon, then what did?

The military experts interviewed by this person claims that a cruise missile would be more consistent with the damage that we see here. Likely, but wouldn’t anyone have seen it then and reported it?

2) If what hit the Pentagon wasn’t a plane, then what happened to the plane that supposed took the rap for damaging the Pentagon?

This is the tougher question. We can’t say the flight never existed, because there are people who lost loved ones on that flight. So if their people never crashed into the Pentagon, what happened to this flight. One theory that I think would make better sense than it just vanishing would be shooting it down.

Say the planes were not as slow as we first were told and actually managed to intercept the plane on it’s way to Washington, and the order was given to fire. That would take care of the plane and eliminate the threat. With planes hitting the towers in New York, and the Pentagon and the Whitehouse in open view… it’s easy to assume that if given the chance this order to gun down any commerical airliner would have been given out. That leads us to question # 3:

3) Why hit the pentagon with a missle to cover up what really happened to this flight?

The answer to this question is easier than the first two. Politics. More than one target hit during 9/11 would make the people more fearful cause more than one city has been hit. It would also absolve the government officials from having to explain themselves during a Presidental race to why he made the call to kill American civilians. Regardless of what happened to that plane, this is what I consider the #1 reason to cover it up, to save politicans from having to answer that qustion from the public and especially from the families of those who were on the flight.

Now matter what you think about 9/11, no one can deny that the Washington story has a lot of holes in it. But according to this video, it wasn’t the only part of 9/11 that didn’t look right. The film shifts it’s focus to New York and possible inconsistancies with that story as well…

Continued in next entry…